COMPARABLES FOR ITES FOR AY 2008-09

LIONBRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD VS ITO [2014] 48 TAXMANN.COM 46 (MUMBAI – TRIB.) – The Tribunal held that comparables providing KPO services like engineering or data analysis/processing etc cannot be comparable with the assessee engaged in providing low end back-office operations. The assessee was engaged in providing low end back-office support services. During AY 2007-08, […]

BRIGAE CORPORATION INDIA (P.) LTD vs ACIT [2014] 48 taxmann.com 176 (Chennai- Trib.)

Facts: For AY 2007-08, the Assessee was engaged in the business of providing customer supporting services in the form of email support, voice support & chatting and financial information support for customers identified by the AEs. The TPO selected M/s.Eclerx Services Ltd as a comparable. The CIT(A) observed that Eclerx has an operating profit of […]

ACUMEN FUND ADVISORY SERVICES INDIA (P.) LTD VS DCIT [2014] 50 TAXMANN.COM 317 (MUMBAI- TRIB.)

The issue for consideration was whether Motilal Oswal Investment Advisor, engaged in merchant banking activity can be compared with Assessee engaged in investment advisory services. Facts: For AY 2009-10, the assessee rendered investment advisory services to its AE. The assessee applied TNMM as the MAM and arrived at mean margin of 18.60% (PLI=OP/OR) by selecting […]

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL (P.) LTD. V. DCIT [2014] 52 TAXMANN.COM 85 (DELHI – TRIB.)

The issue before the ITAT was whether claim of working capital adjustment can be rejected on the ground that the assessee is not engaged in manufacturers/traders. Facts For AY 2006-2007, a TP adjustment was proposed by the TPO in respect of Software development segment and IT enabled services (ITES) segment. The Assessee had claimed that […]

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top